data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37233/372330f9ed5593fd1dc2e4ef74940b2e2a4ab3c4" alt=""
In fact, this point has been made by author Bill McKibben in his bestselling book, Deep Economy. As King summarizes, "McKibben argued that by replacing community with cheap convenience, our society has sold out our collective integrity for quantity. We have chosen to become families who work tirelessly outside the home in order to afford newer vehicles, bigger houses and lavish vacations. In the crux of this busyness, we are forced to forgo the “good” in exchange for the quick and easy."
I think about my own grandmother who seems a lot like King's. Growing up, my grandmother also made many of her own clothes and depended on her direct community for support and survival. When she tells me stories about "better days," it makes me wonder if all of our technology and creature comforts and wealth has improved life at all. Perhaps we don't need to look ahead to a so-called "green revolution." Maybe yesterday is the key to a better tomorrow.
Thoughts?
2 comments:
Totally...
Yes.
Living Simpler - and even more dramatically, living the way they "used to live" (like Little House on the Prairie)...is so much better for everyone - not only is it good for the environment - but it's better for our health too.
walk more. ride bikes more. work hard in the fields and gardens. build things with your hands.
Are you familiar with Albert Borgmann or Jacques Ellul? What do you think about the Neo-monastic movement?
Post a Comment